Date & Time

30 September 2026, 11:00 – 12:15

Room

Galapagos

Chaired by

Dimitri Schuurman

Senior Research Strategist, ENoLL

Type of Session

Research Session

Description

Following a rigorous evaluation process, the OLLD26 evaluation committee has accepted the research papers for this year’s conference. All accepted papers engage with the conference theme, “Living Labs Impacts and Values for a Changing World,” and have been classified into five sub-tracks:

  • Track 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges
  • Track 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, Collaboration, and Innovation Ecosystems
  • Track 3: Living Labs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement
  • Track 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology
  • Track 5: Living Labs Operations, Methods, Tools, and Impact

Papers selected by the Evaluation Committee

A Living Lab approach to needs-driven policy design and policy implementation through interconnected Double Diamond processes

Abstract:

This article explores how Living Lab principles and a Double Diamond framework support needs-driven rural digital policy design and context-sensitive policy implementation in cross-border contexts.  

The study is situated in the Torne Valley, a Finnish-Swedish rural border region characterised by fragmented governance structures, long distances, and limited institutional coordination. Building on previous work on Living Lab-inspired policy co-creation, the article investigates how knowledge generated through participatory co-creation can be translated into institutional practice.  

Following Design Science Research Methodology, the study develops a policy model structured around two interconnected Double Diamond processes. In the first process, Living Lab principles function as generative mechanisms that enable participatory co-creation, generating an understanding of rural needs and local contexts that is structured into needs-driven knowledge for policy design. In the second process, the Living Lab principles are reapplied within institutional contexts, generating an institutional understanding of rural needs and contexts that creates institutional learning and supports context-sensitive policy implementation.  

Empirical material was collected through participatory workshops, interviews, focus groups, and collaborative Living Lab activities across four policy areas. The article contributes to Living Lab and policy implementation research by demonstrating how participatory knowledge can be translated into institutional learning through interconnected Double Diamond processes. 

Dr. Johanna Lindberg

Senior Lecturer in Information Systems, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden

Making Living Labs value tangible beyond output metrics: A co-created indicator framework grounded in practice

Abstract:

Living Labs are widely used as infrastructures for realworld experimentation and cocreation addressing societal and sustainability challenges. However, existing evaluation approaches often rely on output-oriented metrics and struggle to capture the broader value generated through Living Lab activities, spanning operational performance, ecosystem and territorial dynamics, participant outcomes, and academic knowledge production.   

This paper addresses this gap by presenting a codeveloped indicator framework designed to capture the diverse forms of value generated through Living Lab activities while remaining feasible for implementation in heterogeneous realworld and operational contexts. The framework was co-developed through an iterative, participatory methodology combining evaluation expertise, applied research practice, and Living Lab manager co-creation, within the Swiss SWICE consortium. Grounded in an impact model, it adopts a Key Value Indicator (KVI) approach aligned with core Living Lab principles. The resulting framework comprises 20 core indicators organised across seven dimensions, capturing Living Lab operations, realworld experimentation, ecosystem engagement, territorial embeddedness, participantlevel outcomes, and academic impact.  

The framework was designed to be transferable and replicable across diverse Living Lab settings. A first pilot application across six heterogeneous Living Labs demonstrates that these dimensions can be operationalised even within existing reporting processes. For the Living Lab community, the framework offers a concrete tool supporting monitoring, learning, crosssite comparison, and impact communication for Quadruple Helix actor groups. 

Jasmin Annaheim

Project Manager, enconcept AG

Violaine Coard

Research Program Coordinator and Innovation Coach, Smart Living Lab in Fribourg

Where impact actually happens: ethnographic assessment in Living Labs

Abstract:

This paper demonstrates an approach to ethnographic assessment that complements existing qualitative evaluation frameworks in Urban Living Labs, using deep scaling, the embedding of innovation within everyday practices, relationships, and meanings, as its central impact indicator. Where many assessment approaches rely on facilitated co-creation activities and stakeholder self-reporting, ethnographic assessment offers a way of noticing impact where it actually happens: in the slow, mutual, and often invisible processes through which a Living Lab project becomes part of the stakeholders’ everyday practices. 

Drawing on longitudinal fieldwork in an EU-funded Living Lab urban logistics project, we identify three mechanisms through which deep scaling unfolds: the ethnographers’ entry into existing networks of trust, attunement to the temporal rhythms of everyday working life, and sustained attention to the social lives of material objects. Crucially, ethnographic presence does not merely document these processes, it also actively generates momentum for stakeholder engagement by becoming part of the relational fabric it sets out to study. We propose the concept of the Living Lab ethnographic catalyst as a practical role through which this form of embedded, process-oriented assessment can be institutionalised within Living Lab projects from the outset. 

Melania Mihalcea

PhD student, Halmstad University

Vaike Fors

Professor Design Ethnography, Halmstad University

Comparing contexts, comparing Impact: A meta-comparative case study of Living Lab impact assessment

Abstract:

Living Labs are increasingly used as open innovation intermediaries to address complex societal challenges, yet approaches for assessing their impact remain fragmented and context-dependent.  

This paper explores how Living Lab impact assessment frameworks take shape across different governance and cultural contexts through a comparative multiple-case study of Living Lab organizations in Belgium, Japan, and the European Network of Living Labs. Using qualitative cross-case analysis, the study compares contexts, conceptualizations of impact, methodological designs, and assessment functions.  

Findings result in a layered model of context-sensitive impact assessment, showing how assessment frameworks emerge through interactions between governance and cultural conditions, impact assessment architectures, and the practical functions assessment serves. The study contributes to Living Lab research by shifting attention from impact measurement as a project management task toward impact assessment as a contextually embedded and functionally diverse architecture, offering a comparative basis for further methodological development in Living Lab evaluation. 

Ben Robaeyst

Researcher, imec-mict-UGent

Reshaping Local Climate Adaptation Governance Through Living Labs

Abstract:

Climate adaptation governance increasingly demands co-produced, locally embedded approaches that go beyond top-down policy instruments.  

This paper examines how Living Labs can function as transformative governance spaces for climate adaptation, drawing on the PRO-CLIMATE project’s establishment of six Living Labs: Sligo (Ireland), Leipzig (Germany), Badajoz Province (Spain), Bergen (Norway), Gdansk (Poland), and Zakynthos (Greece). Using baseline assessment data, semi-structured interviews, and co-design workshops conducted across all six sites, we analyse how these LLs reshape stakeholder relationships, redefine institutional roles, and generate actionable adaptation strategies tailored to their local socio-ecological contexts.  

Our findings reveal that Living Labs are more than experimental environments; when embedded within the Quadruple Helix Model and supported by co-created Pilot Operational Plans, they become adaptive governance platforms capable of bridging local knowledge, civic agency, and institutional capacity. We identify four governance dimensions that Living Labs reshape: stakeholder integration, co-design of focal action situations, capacity building, and policy alignment. Cross-site comparison surfaces common barriers: governance fragmentation, exclusion of informal actors, limited technical capacity. Shared enablers contain place-based co-creation, change agent roles, and iterative learning. We argue that the Living Lab approach represents a promising mechanism for multi-level climate adaptation governance in Europe, provided structural and institutional conditions are favourable. 

Xu Liu

Postdoctoral researcher

From participation to inclusive governance: The case of a campus Living Lab at the Jagiellonian University

Abstract:

Living Labs are presented as inclusive spaces for open innovation, co-creation and societal engagement. However, participation alone does not guarantee diversity, influence, or long-term impact.  

This paper examines how inclusivity is designed, implemented and reflected upon in CaLiLab, the Campus Living Lab at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland. Drawing on a qualitative single case study, the article analyses CaLiLab documentation, selected pilot projects, institutional materials, and reflective observations from the Lab’s development between 2023 and 2025. The analysis focuses on several dimensions of inclusivity: organizational, epistemic, social, relational, methodological, environmental, and governance-related.  

The findings show that inclusivity in a university-based living lab is not limited to involving diverse stakeholders in individual projects. Rather, it depends on institutional arrangements, facilitation practices, communication channels, methodological choices, and long-term learning mechanisms. The paper contributes to the debate on living labs for inclusive societal engagement by conceptualizing Campus Living Lab as intermediary infrastructures between academia and society. It concludes that inclusive governance requires moving beyond participation towards shared responsibility, reflexive evaluation, and sustained institutional support. 

Dorota Rak

Assistant Professor, Institute of Information Studies at the Jagiellonian University

Magdalena Sawczuk

Assistant Professor, Institute of Entrepreneurship of the Jagiellonian University