Date & Time

30 September 2026, 14:00 – 15:30

Room

Galapagos

Chaired by

Heleen Vreugdenhil

Expert Innovation Processes, DELTARES  

Type of Session

Research Session

Description

Following a rigorous evaluation process, the OLLD26 evaluation committee has accepted the research papers for this year’s conference. All accepted papers engage with the conference theme, “Living Labs Impacts and Values for a Changing World,” and have been classified into five sub-tracks:

  • Track 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges
  • Track 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, Collaboration, and Innovation Ecosystems
  • Track 3: Living Labs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement
  • Track 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology
  • Track 5: Living Labs Operations, Methods, Tools, and Impact

Papers selected by the Evaluation Committee

Olivestone retreat: Designing a connected rural Living Lab cluster for regenerative agritourism, heritage and ecosystem monitoring

Abstract:

Living Labs (LLs) provide a practical way to co-create, trial, and evaluate innovations in real-life settings, but most guidance is tailored to urban, project-driven contexts. Small rural hospitality sites must integrate experimentation with daily operations while caring for heritage assets and managing environmental risks.  

This paper presents a design blueprint for Olivestone Retreat (Kentrika Tzoumerka, Greece) as a connected rural living lab cluster comprising seven interlinked micro-labs: agritourism, stone buildings, olive grove, river corridor, heritage landscape, walking paths, and forest. Grounded in living lab theory, place-based innovation, and design science and action research, the blueprint translates the concept into an actionable operating model: a “7+1” architecture (seven micro-labs plus a shared governance–data–learning backbone), clear roles and decision rights, lightweight monitoring protocols, and a staged evaluation framework suitable for multi-season learning.  

The empirical status is deliberately bounded: this paper reports implementation-ready design artefacts derived from site documentation, the project concept, and a literature synthesis; it does not report completed pilots, stakeholder co-design data, sensor datasets, or measured impacts. Its contribution is therefore a design proposition for rural SMEs whose usefulness and transferability must be tested through the planned implementation and longitudinal evaluation. 

Fotios Konstantinidis

Coordinator, Olivestone Living Lab

From farm to family: A five-country Living Lab federation as constitutive infrastructure for One Health Microbiome Science in the OneHealthOme Project

Abstract:

Microbiome research is dominated by single-compartment studies that rarely translate into community-relevant action. The OneHealthOme Horizon Europe Innovation Action embeds cross-ecosystem multi-omics research in a transnational federation of five Living Labs, anchored by an accredited ENoLL Member One Health Open Innovation Living Lab. Living Labs here are constitutive infrastructure: the means by which food, household, environmental and human compartments are jointly sampled and interpreted, and by which researchers, families, producers and policymakers co-produce evidence.  

We present a family-based multi-season cohort with a randomised Farm-to-Fork basket intervention, governed by a federated dual-level pipeline and pre-registered causal-inference analytics, and alignment with SOILL, the ENoLL-coordinated support structure for Mission Soil Living Labs, extending Farm-to-Family upstream to soil. 

Rodolfo Sardone

Director Research, Innovation and Technology Transfer, Local Health Authority of Taranto (ASL Taranto)

Co-creating urban climate futures: Comparative insights from vision development exercises in seven CARMINE Living Labs

Abstract:

Climate adaptation in metropolitan regions increasingly requires participatory and systemic approaches capable of addressing interconnected environmental and social challenges.  

This paper examines how Living Lab methodologies and a System Innovation Approach support the co-creation of long-term climate resilience visions through participatory visioning exercises. Drawing on seven CARMINE Living Lab case studies – Athens, Barcelona, Birmingham, Bologna, Brașov, Leipzig, and Prague – the study comparatively analyses stakeholder-developed future visions addressing diverse climate risks, including extreme heat, wildfire, social vulnerability, and urban infrastructure pressures. The findings show that participatory visioning enables stakeholders to translate local climate risks into holistic and place-based resilience narratives integrating environmental, social, technological, and governance dimensions.  

Despite important contextual differences, common priorities emerged across the cases, including nature-based solutions, integrated governance, public health and wellbeing, social inclusion, and evidence-based planning. The paper contributes to the literature on sustainability transitions and participatory climate governance by demonstrating how Living Labs can support transformative and socially legitimate climate adaptation pathways across multiple metropolitan contexts.

Lydia Papadaki

Researcher, Alliance of Excellence for Research and Innovation on Aephoria (AE4RIA)

Integrating the natural environment into Living Lab innovation processes: A Delphi-based approach to bioregional criteria validation

Abstract:

Living Labs are widely recognised as collaborative innovation ecosystems structured around the Quadruple Helix model, bringing together academia, industry, government, and civil society. Yet, as Living Labs are increasingly mobilised to address grand societal challenges, including biodiversity loss and natural resource management, their predominantly socio-technical framing reveals a structural blind spot: the natural environment, conceptualised as the Quintuple Helix of Innovation, remains largely absent from their operational frameworks and validation processes. This research-in-progress paper addresses this gap in the context of an ongoing project developing a criteria framework for qualifying bioregional projects, constructed through a literature review and a practitioner workshop. A Delphi consultation constitutes the third validation stage and the core contribution of this paper. We argue that deliberately structuring the Delphi expert panel to represent all five helixes constitutes a concrete step toward operationalizing the Quintuple Helix in Living Lab validation processes. This work contributes a transferable methodological pathway grounded in a rural Living Lab engaged in ecological transition and advances the theoretical framing of bioregional Living Labs as a distinct category of innovation ecosystem oriented toward the Quintuple Helix.

Juliette Focki

Designer & PhD student

CivicDesign4HER Living Labs: A systemic co-C-creation approach to strengthening the civic engagement of migrant women

Abstract:

Migrant women’s civic participation is constrained by a set of interrelated factors, including limited access to information, language and communication barriers, under-representation, socio-cultural constraints and unequal power relations. Many existing efforts to strengthen civic engagement have relied on fragmented, short-term measures that cannot address the systemic and structural nature of marginalisation. In response, CivicDesign4HER proposes a Living Lab approach to strengthening migrant women’s civic participation through participation, systems thinking and co-creation.  

This paper sets out the conceptual and methodological foundations of the CivicDesign4HER Living Labs. These labs operate as local learning environments in which migrant women and other stakeholders examine civic problems and design responses to them. The methodology draws on systemic design, participatory civic education, adult learning and inclusive facilitation, and moves through four connected phases — explore, reframe, create and catalyse — that support reflection, collective meaning-making, experimentation and sustained civic engagement.  

The paper presents the methodological framework, the facilitation strategies designed to address power asymmetries between migrant women and institutional stakeholders, and the evaluation strategy for the pilot Living Labs, before outlining the expected contributions of the project.

Stefania Savva

Director of Research, SYNTHESIS Center for Research and Education

Valeria Ianilli

Full Professor, Politecnico di Milano

Co-creating responses to youth loneliness through community spaces: A Living Lab approach in Madrid

Abstract:

Youth loneliness is an increasingly complex societal challenge affecting wellbeing, mental health, participation, and community life. This paper presents SOLIBCM, a participatory research project in the Community of Madrid that examines how university students experience loneliness in relation to public and community spaces, with particular attention to public libraries. The project adopts a Living Lab methodology, understood as a space for co-creation and community mediation.  

The research combines survey data on loneliness and the use of community spaces, 17 interviews with professionals from libraries, NGOs, health centres, and youth services, as well as upcoming focus groups with young people. These findings will support the co-creation of situated prototypes aimed at fostering social connection. SOLIBCM brings together young people, researchers, libraries, health and youth professionals, NGOs, and local public actors through a collaborative Quadruple Helix approach.  

The paper contributes in three ways: it frames youth loneliness as a community-based societal challenge, demonstrates how Living Labs can transform experiences and local knowledge into co-created solutions, and highlights the relational value generated through the process itself, including trust-building, collaboration, visibility, and shared ownership. 

Lisandra Otero Borges

PhD Candidate, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid