Time

14.00 – 15.30

Room

Aria

Chaired by

Koen Vervoort

Type of Session

Research Session

Description

Following the evaluation procedure the OLLD evaluation committee has accepted the research papers. All papers reflect on the theme of the conference “LIVING LABS FOR REGENERATIVE FUTURES: Connecting Local and Global Innovation Ecosystems ” and have been classified according to its sub-tracks. These are: TRACK 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges; TRACK 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, collaboration and innovation ecosystems; TRACK 3: LLs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement; TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology; TRACK 5: Living Labs Operation, Methods, Tools, and Impact.

Papers selected by the Evaluation Committee

The marriage between Living labs and citizen science: Applied insights and future directions

Abstract: Citizen-centric knowledge generation (citizen science) and citizen-centric open innovation (living labs) are powerful, complementary approaches for citizen engagement in the process of societal transformation. However, even joining fundamental traits, both Citizen Science and Living Labs communities have historically suffered absence of systematic connection, and institutional initiatives and policies around open science and open innovation have kept silos, with the negative consequence of the absence of a firm link between high quality scientific knowledge and impactful innovation. In this work, we support the most needed acceleration of the approach between the communities of Citizen Science and Living Labs. For the identification of common traits and opportunities for collaboration, we designed and implemented a series of specific workshops, based on a collection of four case studies, which were curated from contributions from different institutional partners in varied contexts, reflecting practical dimensions of participatory science and citizen-centric innovation. Two specific workshops were carried out at the major conferences on Citizen Science (ECSA’24) and Living Labs (ENoLL’24), developing as an outcome a joint narrative for the joint added value offered. Our work shows relevant evidence on common values and methods, clear examples of collaboration, and a proposal for an institutional roadmap and further steps.   

Key words: Citizen Science, Living Labs, Open Science, Open Innovation, Policy information. 

Rosa Arias

ECSA Board of Directors, CEO & Founder at Science For Change

Defining the Role of Living Labs to Clinical Research: Initial Findings for Framework Development

Abstract: Integrating research into clinical environments is critical for advancing healthcare, yet various barriers hinder healthcare professionals from participating in externally initiated research efforts. This study investigates how Living Labs can support the integration of such research into routine clinical practice. Through a mixed-methods questionnaire distributed to Living Lab practitioners, we identify key barriers including time constraints, misalignment between research agendas and clinical needs, and inadequate incentive structures. The qualitative data about Living Lab offering were thematically analysed and mapped across four research phases, planning, preparation, implementation, and dissemination, as defined by the Living Lab Management System. Preliminary results, based on responses from seven Living Labs, suggest that Living Labs can enhance research relevance, foster co-ownership among professionals, and serve as hubs for multi-stakeholder engagement. They also provide mechanisms for academic recognition and professional development, which may act as incentives for clinician participation. The outcome of this work is an initial evidence-informed framework that outlines actionable strategies to address common barriers to clinical research implementation.

Key words: Clinical environments, framework, innovation, healthcare professionals, implementation  

Despoina Petsani

Research Associate, Lab of Medical Physics and Digital Innovation, AUTH

Soil literacy activities in the framework of soil health Living Labs

Abstract: The iCOSHELLs project, part of the Horizon Europe initiative, supports the EU Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe,’ aiming to achieve healthy soils by 2030. This project establishes six Living Labs (LLs), where local stakeholders co-design and test solutions for improving soil health.  

The main challenge is the significant gap in knowledge about soil health, which hinders sustainable practices and policy advocacy. Modern lifestyles disconnect people from natural ecosystems, reducing appreciation for soil’s role in ecosystem resilience, climate action, and food security. To foster soil literacy, the project adopts a more-than-human perspective, recognizing soil as a dynamic, living entity. Four primary methods are being developed and tested in the LLs:  

  1. **Local Soil**: Sensitizes participants to soil as a living entity by discussing its values, capabilities, needs, and senses.
  2. **Community Soil**: Explores soil as a community stakeholder, leading to the creation of a Community Soil Manifesto. 
  3. **Systems Soil**: Discusses soil from a systems perspective, covering climate justice, historical land use, and indigenous knowledge. 
  4. **Soil Walk**: Involves a facilitated walk to encounter and discuss soil from a more-than-human perspective. 

Key words: Tools, design, more-than-human, ecosystems, co-creation.   

Hayley Ho

Researcher & senior designer, RISE

From lab to market: Catalyzing research-driven innovations with a novel process model

Abstract: Innovation procurement is often dominated by market demand over research-driven solutions. To truly unlock academia’s potential, we need comprehensive and systemic approaches. While agile piloting shows promise, commercialisation requires tailored support and pragmatic methods to accommodate early-stage innovations. Effective innovation ecosystems, accessible Living Labs, and dedicated innovation orchestrators are all crucial enablers.  

This paper introduces a novel process model for catalysing viable business from academic research, aiming to find sustainable solutions for broader societal problems. Informed by insights from the FinEst Mini-Piloting Programme (2021-2024), this model addresses its successes and shortcomings in fostering collaboration and achieving commercialisation. It is designed to unlock the commercial potential of academic research within agile piloting programmes supported by Living Labs and innovation ecosystems.  

The model bridges the gap between academic research and successful commercial rollout through a four-phase process: 1) Academic Discovery, 2) Collective Explication, translating research outcomes to match real-world problems via co-creation; 3) Agile Development, iteratively developing and validating solutions in collaboration; 4) Commercial Delivery, featuring a phased rollout. This proposed model and the learnings from the FinEst Mini-Piloting Programme offer a practical contribution to enhancing the commercialisation of research-driven innovations and encouraging academia to harvest the full potential of Living Labs.  

Key words: Research-based innovation, Innovation ecosystem, Agile piloting, Living Labs, Innovation procurement  

Anne-Mari Sandell

Project Manager and Service Designer, Forum Virium Helsinki

The Montado Living Lab: Catalyzing soil health through formal and informal co-construction networks

Abstract:

The Montado, a complex farming system, faces significant threats from global pressures pushing towards either agricultural intensification or land abandonment, despite its crucial role in delivering high-quality production alongside diverse ecosystem services.  

We introduce the Montado Living Lab (Montado LL)1, a Living Lab centered on the Portuguese agro-silvo-pastoral system Montado and the Tertulia’s do Montado2, a transdisciplinary dialogue platform that aim to collectively frame the sustainability problems of the Montado for better alignment of research and non-academic activities.   

This study analyzes how the formal structure and collaborative approach of the Montado LL and the Informal structure of Tertúlias do Montado facilitate the generation of context-specific knowledge, testing and validation of innovations, overall driving processes for the adoption of sustainable soil and other management practices and, the production of evidence-based knowledge to inform, adapt and develop policies. 

Key words: Agro-silvo-pastoral, Soil, Transdisciplinarity

Dr Susana Filipe

Executive Director, CHANGE – Institute for Global Change and Sustainability