Time

15.45 – 17.15

Room

Aria

Chaired by

Sobah Abbas Petersen

Type of Session

Research Session

Description

Following the evaluation procedure the OLLD evaluation committee has accepted the research papers. All papers reflect on the theme of the conference “LIVING LABS FOR REGENERATIVE FUTURES: Connecting Local and Global Innovation Ecosystems ” and have been classified according to its sub-tracks. These are: TRACK 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges; TRACK 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, collaboration and innovation ecosystems; TRACK 3: LLs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement; TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology; TRACK 5: Living Labs Operation, Methods, Tools, and Impact.

Papers selected by the Evaluation Committee

Co-creation of radical social innovation in Living Labs: assessing cognitive, relational and contextual conditions

Abstract: Research on Living Labs highlights their potential to tackle Grand Societal Challenges through social innovation. Yet, further evidence is needed on the conditions and pathways enabling this process. This research in progress analyses the knowledge conditions under which co-creation initiatives in Living Labs result in social innovations. Theoretically, we explore some of the epistemic aspects of co-creation literature highlighting how radical social innovations result from combinations of knowledge conditions related to cognitive, relational and contextual dimensions (section 2). Empirically, we study focal innovations in 15 European Living Labs in the Agri-food and Healthcare sectors and perform a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) building on data from semi-structured interviews (section 3). Preliminary findings show that distributed networks are a necessary condition enabling access to new knowledge sources that feed into radical social innovations. Furthermore, these innovations may result from two possible combinations of conditions at play, where a high knowledge diversity is a common attribute amidst different types of challenges and organisational environments (section 4). These research will provide lessons for both practice and research on co-creation in Living Labs (section 5).  

Key words: Living Labs, Social Innovation, Knowledge conditions, Co-creation

 

Juan Pablo Centeno

PhD researcher at the KU Leuven Public Governance Institute (PGI)

Catalyzing regeneration through territorial labs: Living Lab innovation in declining agrarian landscapes

Abstract:This presentation introduces the Territorial Lab methodology, a model for embedded Living Labs tailored to the challenges of land abandonment and demographic decline in rural Europe. Developed by the authors, the model adapts Living and Land-Based Lab concepts to fragile agrarian territories, using short-format “Challenges” to iteratively constitute long-term experimental spaces that reactivate land stewardship incentives through localized food value chains.  

Two pilot projects—Transitioning a Landscape1 and Shaping the Ground2—were carried out in Monti Prenestini (Lazio, Italy) to develop and test this approach. The first engaged local stakeholders, mapped abandonment dynamics, and designed a 3-hectare Territorial Lab prototype with actionable incentive frameworks. The second piloted the lab through a participatory toolkit for arboreal biodiversity mapping with local farmers. Together, they explored how embedded experimentation can catalyze systemic outcomes by activating and reweaving relationships among producers, processors, distributors, and consumers.  

The Territorial Lab is an evolving platform that aligns co-creation with strategic ecosystem-building. Its success lies not only in data or tools produced, but in enabling self-sustaining configurations of local actors. It offers an emerging model for embedding innovation where mandates are absent contributing directly to EU missions like A Soil Deal for Europe3.  

Key words: Living Lab, land abandonment, territorial regeneration, agroecology, co-creation, food value chain

Nicolás Delgado Alcega

Co-founder & vice president, Liminal

Exploring the design and contributions of urban agroecosystem Living Labs for sustainable city development

Abstract: Living Labs are open innovative ecosystems embedded in real-life contexts, designed to tackle societal challenges through iterative, stakeholder-driven processes. Within the urban sustainability agenda, Urban Agroecosystem Living Labs (UALLs) have gained prominence for their role in transforming agri-food systems and enhancing urban resilience. This study examines the design and contributions of UALLs, based on a content analysis of cases reported in academic and grey literature. Six UALLs were identified, revealing considerable diversity in their objectives, operational processes, activities, and participant configurations. Beyond improving food security and agricultural productivity, UALLs contribute to sustainable urban transitions by fostering responsible consumption, enhancing community cohesion, increasing urban greening and biodiversity, reducing waste, and supporting climate mitigation efforts. The RUBA Initiative, led by EAN University in Colombia, exemplifies a comprehensive UALL model that integrates ecological, economic, and social dimensions. Despite their potential, most UALLs lack explicit alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and often fall short in measuring long-term impact. This paper underscores the need to strengthen evaluation frameworks, adopt SDG-based indicators, and improve scalability. Ultimately, it advocates for the broader adoption of UALLs as adaptable platforms capable of advancing systemic change towards sustainable and inclusive urban futures.  

Key words: Living lab; co-creation; innovation; stakeholders; SDGs; circular economy; sustainable future

Diego Alejandro Riaño Herrera

Environmental Engineer & Master’s student in Sustainable Agricultural Sciences

Designing with Callon's theory of translation to realise deep stakeholder engagement towards co-creating system level change in Living Labs: the case of ReNu2Cycle

Abstract: Role-play simulations are increasingly recognised as valuable tools for experiential learning, stakeholder dialogue, and collaborative problem-solving in complex innovation ecosystems. This paper introduces the Process of Translation Serious Game, designed to explore negotiation and alignment within Living Lab contexts. Grounded in Michel Callon’s theory of translation and the concept of Obligatory Passage Points, the game creates a structured setting where participants embody actors from across the quadruple helix, academia, industry, government, and civil society. Through role-play, participants engage with the diverse interests and constraints that shape co-creation, simulating how alignment is negotiated in real-world innovation processes. The game was piloted at the European Sustainable Nutrient Initiative (ESNI) 2024 conference with researchers and policymakers. Drawing on observational data, the paper examines how participants inhabited their roles, navigated conflict, and worked toward consensus. Findings show that the game helps surface hidden assumptions, foster empathy, and support critical reflection on power, legitimacy, and collaboration. We argue that serious play can enrich Living Lab practice by offering a dynamic method for engaging with stakeholder complexity and building capacity for mission-oriented innovation. The paper concludes with recommendations for integrating role-play simulations into Living Lab methodologies to support deeper and more inclusive stakeholder engagement. 

Key words: Living Labs, Translation, Callon, Serious Game

Annmarie Ryan

Associate Professor of Marketing at the Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick

Improving waste sorting through a campus Living Lab experiment

Abstract: This paper presents a Campus Living Lab (CLL) experiment designed to improve waste sorting behaviour in an academic office environment. The study explores how co-creation with campus users, “campusians”, can enhance engagement and foster long-term behavioral change. Conducted at the Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development at Utrecht University, the intervention was co-created with staff and operational stakeholders. The intervention combined visual decision aids with conversation starters and playful elements to improve sorting practices. The project applies the Living Lab approach as a real-world sustainability experiment involving deliberate intervention and systematic data collection. Waste sorting accuracy is measured through three waste scans (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and long-term), and a post-intervention survey captures behavioral drivers. Initial results from the baseline scan reveal significant sorting errors in plastic and general waste streams, while workshop insights highlight motivational, informational, and infrastructural barriers. This study demonstrates how CLLs can serve as innovation platforms for addressing sustainability challenges through user-led design and participatory processes. The findings contribute to broader discussions on the role of Living Labs in enabling regenerative futures.  

Key words: Sustainability experiment; Theory of Planned Behavior; Gamification; Circular economy

Claudia Stuckrath

PhD Researcher & Advisor, Utrecht University | Chair, Campus & Higher Education Thematic Group, ENoLL

What transformative influence of energy communities and Living Labs?

AbstractEnergy communities have grown significantly in Europe with great expectations about their potential to develop a decentralised, democratic and sustainable future energy system. There is little evidence of the role of living labs in the evolution of energy communities as intermediary mechanisms for new transition pathways. This article contributes mainly to the literature on sustainable transitions by answering the following research question; What are the underlying expectations towards the role of energy communities and living labs in a changing regime?  

Two comparative case studies of Living Labs working with energy communities at oPENLab Genk, Belgium and Sion Living Lab, Switzerland are being researched. Stakeholder interviews and value network mapping reveal the expectations towards actors’ roles and the value they bring to the energy system. Alignments, overlaps, gaps and conflicts will be identified and their relational aspects analysed.  

We expect to find diversity in expectations towards the role of the Living Lab as an intermediary mechanism in the evolution of socially innovative energy communities. The research will help us to theorize more concretely about expectations and the transformation dynamics at play and the potential for destabilization of the existing energy regime. Practically, the research will help guide the co-design of expectations.  

Key words: Transformation, expectations, energy communities, living labs, institutionalization, value network mapping

Fiona Zimmermann

Panel manager, Energy Living Lab