DATE & TIME
30 September 2026, 14:00 – 15:30
ROOM
Peacock 3
TRACKS
TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology
Description
This workshop bridges the gap between Living Lab activities and measurable results. Participants assess project maturity using a Social Readiness Radar and cause-and-effect strategy. You will learn to validate assumptions and refine your innovation practices through peer feedback.
Agenda
| Time | Item |
|---|---|
| 14:00 – 14:10 |
Kick-off & Framing Facilitator Role. Introduce the theme: rapid digital/social shifts. Pose the core question: “What is the biggest challenge influencing Living Labs right now?” Participant Role. Individual brainstorming. Share challenges via post-its or digital tools. |
| 14:10 – 14:30 |
Mapping Impact: “Where Do We Stand?” Facilitator Role. Explain the Output → Outcome → Impact logic. Provide concrete examples to avoid theoretical confusion. Participant Role. Map their own project or Living Lab onto the logic chain. Formulate “If… then…” cause-effect relationships. |
| 14:30 – 14:40 |
Critical Reflection: The AI Bridge Facilitator Role. Introduce the “break point” concept. Challenge participants: “Can AI bridge this gap, or is it a Human-only zone?” Participant Role. Identify the weakest link in their impact chain. Determine if AI can solve it or if it requires human-centric funding/protection. |
| 14:40 – 15:00 |
Social Readiness Radar Facilitator Role. Introduce the Social Readiness Level (SRL) framework and the 4 pillars: Trust, Culture, Capacity, and Systemic Support. Participant Role. Self-assess their project on a scale of 1–5 across the 4 pillars. Map the “Radar” and identify the “red flag” (lowest score). |
| 15:00 – 15:20 |
From Practice to Transformation Facilitator Role. Facilitate 1-on-1 peer coaching. “If AI did this tomorrow, would it build or destroy community trust?” Participant Role. Pair up to peer-review one specific practice. Decide what to delegate to AI (efficiency) and what to keep human insight. |
| 15:20 – 15:30 |
Wrap-Up & Commitments Facilitator Role. Summarize common “red flags” and AI opportunities discovered. Closing remarks. Participant Role. Share one “insight” and one “immediate action” they will implement in their own Living Lab. |
Facilitators
Emanuela Buzenche
Bioengineer, User Experience & Living Lab Researcher, Good Tech Living Lab
Emanuela Buzenche
Bioengineer, User Experience & Living Lab Researcher, Good Tech Living LabMy work focuses on co-creation, innovation project development, stakeholder engagement, and the assessment of innovation impact through Living Lab methodologies. I facilitate innovation workshops, conduct applied research, and contribute to national and international initiatives that support user-centered and socially impactful innovation.
Cristina Baghiu
Living Lab and European Digital Innovation Hub Coordinator. PhD researcher in AI Ethics
Cristina Baghiu
Living Lab and European Digital Innovation Hub Coordinator. PhD researcher in AI EthicsExpert in technology validation, test-before-invest, EU AI Act and societal readiness. Looking to expand Living Labs in Eastern Europe innovation ecosystems.