Time

11.00 – 12.30

Room

Aria

Chaired by

Dimitri Schuurman

Type of Session

Research Session

Description

Following the evaluation procedure the OLLD evaluation committee has accepted the research papers. All papers reflect on the theme of the conference “LIVING LABS FOR REGENERATIVE FUTURES: Connecting Local and Global Innovation Ecosystems ” and have been classified according to its sub-tracks. These are: TRACK 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges; TRACK 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, collaboration and innovation ecosystems; TRACK 3: LLs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement; TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology; TRACK 5: Living Labs Operation, Methods, Tools, and Impact.

Papers selected by the Evaluation Committee

Public libraries as Living Labs: Co-creation and public value to address grand societal challenges

Abstract: Public libraries are undergoing a significant transformation from traditional repositories of knowledge into dynamic living labs that foster co-creation, innovation, and community engagement. This article examines the living lab paradigm in public libraries, focusing on how participatory design, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and flexible, hybrid spaces contribute to the creation of public value. Drawing on in-depth case studies of the Library Living Lab (L3) and Bibliolab network in Catalonia, as well as Medialab-Tabakalera in San Sebastián, the article analyzes the drivers of public value, such as  early and active user involvement in co-creation processes, spatial design that enables serendipitous interaction, the development of staff skills to engage diverse users, creative metrics to capture intangible outcomes, and robust institutional support. It also addresses shared lessons on how public value is manifested in public libraries, including community building, and the promotion of inclusion, social cohesion and diversity. The findings demonstrate that libraries as living labs can serve as innovation intermediaries, bridging sectors and empowering diverse communities to address grand societal challenges, with co-creation at the center of their mission.    

Key words: public libraries, living labs, co-creation, public value, community engagement, social challenges 

David Gago

Professor of Economics in the Department of Economic Analysis at the National University of Distance Education (UNED)

Co-creating rural digital policy across borders: A Living Lab-based double daimond approach

Abstract: This research-in-progress applies the Double Diamond design model and Living Lab (LL) methodology to co-create rural digital policy in the cross-border regions of Muodoslompolo (Sweden) and Muonio (Finland). Drawing on participatory speculative and critical design methods, such as cultural probes, design fiction, and scenario-based workshops, the project engages diverse stakeholders through the PentaHelix model. Early activities, including interdisciplinary workshops, interviews, and community engagement, have informed a draft policy prototype and a prioritization matrix aligned with key Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The study contributes both practically, by developing a context-sensitive digital policy and action plan, and academically, by advancing LL practices in rural, cross-border settings. The proposed approach offers a replicable model for inclusive and participatory policymaking in underrepresented regions.  

Key words: Living Lab, Rural, Digital, Policy, PentaHelix, Double Diamond  

Abdolrasoul Habibipour

Associate Professor in Information Systems at Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, and Managing Director of Botnia Living Lab

Participation that matters: Expert insights on designing inclusive Living Labs

Abstract: Living Labs (LLs) are increasingly used as participatory infrastructures, aiming to democratize innovation by involving citizens in co-creation processes. However, despite their inclusive philosophy, many LLs struggle to engage vulnerable communities in meaningful ways. This paper explores strategies to support inclusive citizen engagement in LLs, based on 12 interviews with experts in participatory research and inclusion. Results were structured across barrier type (structural, institutional, and cultural barriers) and the three-layered LL model (macro, meso, and micro levels). Findings show that inclusion is not a one-time design decision but an ongoing, relational practice requiring flexibility, transparency, and collaboration across researchers, intermediaries, and communities. We argue that to fully realize their potential, LLs must move beyond procedural inclusion toward meaningful participation that amplifies underrepresented voices and addresses power imbalances. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for LL practitioners and policymakers, urging future research that centers citizens lived experiences to advance inclusive innovation and foster LLs that genuinely address diverse societal needs.  

Key words: Inclusivity, Diversity, Vulnerable Citizens, Citizen Engagement, Living Labs  

Aline Duelen

PhD student Participatory Research & Citizen Engagement

Botanical villages, an initiative in favor of local flora

Abstract: Floralab+ is an Interreg POCTEFA project entitled Shared Strategy and Tools for the Flora of the Eastern Pyrenees directed by the French Fédération des Réserves Naturelles Catalanes. The partners of the project are proposing an innovation strategy for the study, preservation and dissemination of the flora of the Pyrenees. One of the actions considered in the project is the development, promotion and management of the future accreditation of the Pyrenean Botanical Villages, a label intended for municipalities that aims to support and promote initiatives to consider local flora in territorial policies. The project has a very specific roadmap to achieve the proposed objectives, all done with strict harmony between all the partners involved and regarding the cross-border nature of the project. At this moment, in May 2025, the network is working on interviews with the first interested villages’ selection and on the accreditation methodology. This is research in process projects that must be flexible to the inputs received by different partners and would be in the future. The development of the future label is still in progress, and all the cross-border network is working on it.   

Key words: Villages, flora, botany, Pyrenees, accreditation, cross-border cooperation. 

Clara Pladevall Izard

Graduate in Biology from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

A harmonized monitoring theoretical framework for pollination restoration Living Labs in Europe

Abstract: Pollination is the mother core of nature. Pollinators are so referred because they are responsible for the reproduction of 75% of agricultural crops and 90% of all plants, and MS framework approach, principles of innovation economy, and the participatory social learning approach within the scope of 17 Living Labs in Europe within the Horizon Europe project RestPoll. are also estimated to contribute approximately $127-152 billion to global economic welfare. However, wild pollinators are in danger of decline due to various conditions. Therefore, there is a need for pollination restoration. This research focuses on developing a theoretical framework for envisioning and structuring new policies for pollination restoration in living labs, transdisciplinary environments based on stakeholder engagement.  A transdisciplinary monitoring theoretical framework is developed combining the social-ecological system  

Key words: Living Labs, Innovation, Socio-Ecological Systems, Pollinator Restoration, Monitoring Theoretical Framework

Zehra Basaran

PhD candidate and research engineer at L'Institut Agro Montpellier and CIHEAM IAM Montpellier

Co-create forest management and policy solutions: Living Labs in the Safe-net project

Abstract: Forest biodiversity loss and climate change are prompting an urgent search for governance models that reconcile conservation, climate mitigation and rural prosperity. The Horizon Europe SafeNet project (2025–2030) responds by embedding Living Labs (LLs) in four representative European forest biomes—Mediterranean, Alpine, temperate and boreal—and by establishing a panEuropean Policy Lab. Stakeholder engagement across all sites is facilitated throughout the project by ESSRG, ensuring inclusive and wellstructured dialogue processes. Each LL convenes 6–12 stakeholders drawn from policy, forest owners and managers, industry, civilsociety actors including NGOs, conservation organizations and research institutions. Collectively they link regulatory agendas with operational realities, market incentives, socialecological accountability and scientific evidence, enabling richer deliberations and more robust innovation pathways.  

Key words: Forest management, net-map method, facilitation, policy lab 

Bence Lukács

Researcher in ecological economics